![Spears: Environment Canada won’t answer my carbon-tax query, 5 years on Spears: Environment Canada won’t answer my carbon-tax query, 5 years on](https://news5alert.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/climate-nature-benefits-20191010.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=288&h=216&sig=nwv3uxb29NB2X6le9JGiOQ)
There are no consequences when the federal government fails to obey its own rules about releasing information the public is entitled to.
![NASA image of polar ice](https://smartcdn.gprod.postmedia.digital/ottawacitizen/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/climate-nature-benefits-20191010.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=288&h=216&sig=nwv3uxb29NB2X6le9JGiOQ)
Article content
A curious thing happened five years ago: The federal government imposed a car-bon tax on April 1, 2019. And this newspaper sent an access-to-information re-quest related to it that has received no response to this day.
Next week marks the fifth birthday of the Postmedia information request that Environment Canada keeps refusing to answer.
Article content
Maybe the odd events of that week are nothing, just a coincidence. But with no information available, who can tell?
Advertisement 2
Article content
Here’s the coincidence: On April 2, 2019, one day after the new carbon tax began, Environment and Climate Change Canada announced research showing that Canada will suffer twice as much from climate change as most other countries. This was actually old news, repackaged: It’s been known since the 1980s that Arctic countries are warming twice as much as many other countries, and we’re a country with a huge Arctic landmass. So why announce this as news? It’s an update on details, but the basic story is well known.
So, we wondered: Is the climate study being published in order to help justify the tax increase? Is federal science being used in this case to make a new tax appear necessary?
We asked for some emails on the topic, using the formal access-to-information system, then paid our five bucks and waited. The rules for federal access requests say that the feds owe an answer to whoever asks within 30 days unless there are complications, which can add several months.
Right away, complications popped up. Big ones. ECCC (formerly Environment Canada until some genius decided to add “climate change” in case no one knew that’s an environment thing) wanted another 180 days to reply. An extra half-year. This would have provided the information we sought a couple of weeks after the general election of October, 2019.
Advertisement 3
Article content
We waited. There’s an appeal process but it can take a year or more. And there are no consequences when the federal government fails to obey its own rules: They miss a deadline by five years, and everyone just goes home. (Try that with your income taxes.)
Days became months and months became years and still we have no answer. The specific request we made was for emails within ECCC’s communications department over a one-month period leading up to the announcement of the new climate study.
It has now taken 60 months to review, and not yet release, one month of emails. Emails among a tiny group of people on a single subject.
And it’s a pattern. A 2019 survey by ECCC showed the department simply walked away from more than 600 access requests from the public, media and businesses in the previous 10 years, mostly after the requests had sat unanswered for years.
Bizarrely, a news release — a public announcement — has now become the ob-ject of secrecy, and the feds say working from home is one reason they can’t do their work to release it. The analyst was working at home and explained that the paper documents were still at the office — not even scanned a year after we made our request. There were two boxes of records, and he can’t look through two boxes so quickly.
Advertisement 4
Article content
There were, the department added, “competing priorities.” It left that one hang-ing.
Let’s jump back to April, 2019, when the secrecy began. It’s been a long, long time.
How long is five years? It’s longer than the entire First World War, for starters.
The LRT was seven months old in 2019.
The Ottawa Senators had just traded away star forwards Matt Duchene, Mark Stone and Ryan Dzingel days earlier, and had not yet brought in DJ Smith as coach.
No one had yet heard the word COVID, and the lockdown was still almost a year into the future.
Andrew Scheer was preparing to run for prime minister.
The Leafs lost Round One of the playoffs, again.
Both the minister’s office and the department were quick to tell us in 2019, via two brief emails, that the new tax and the climate research report were in no way related. But they dismissed our request for specific, further information and offered no detail on the central question: Why did these two events — the tax, and the public release of a study — coincide in the first place?
It’s a problem that is trending in modern journalism. You can’t talk to government people. They won’t speak. They just email, and a reporter can’t follow up with a question like: What do you mean? Or, why is that? Or anything else.
So maybe it’s all just coincidence, but if people can’t handle simple access-to-information requests, how can we know?
They’re still sitting on our five bucks.
Journalist Tom Spears is a former Ottawa Citizen environment reporter.
Recommended from Editorial
Article content